On general closure operators and quasi factorization structures

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Pure Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Pure Mathematics, Faculty of Math and Computers, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

3 Department of Pure Mathematics, Faculty of Math and Computer, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

Abstract

In this article the notions of quasi mono (epi) as a generalization of mono (epi), (quasi weakly hereditary) general closure operator $\mathbf{C}$ on a category $\mathcal{X}$ with respect to a class $\mathcal{M}$ of morphisms, and quasi factorization structures in a category $\mathcal{X}$ are introduced. It is shown that under certain conditions, if $(\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{M})$ is a quasi factorization structure in $\mathcal{X}$, then $\mathcal{X}$ has a quasi right $\mathcal{M}$-factorization structure and a quasi left $\mathcal{E}$-factorization structure. It is also shown that for a quasi weakly hereditary and quasi idempotent QCD-closure operator with respect to a certain class $\mathcal{M}$, every quasi factorization structure $(\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{M})$ yields a quasi factorization structure relative to the given closure operator; and that for a closure operator with respect to a certain class $\mathcal{M}$, if the pair of classes of quasi dense and quasi closed morphisms forms a quasi factorization structure, then the closure operator is both quasi weakly hereditary and quasi idempotent. Several illustrative examples are provided.

Keywords

References

[1] Adamek, J., Herrlich, H., Rosicky, J., and Tholen, W., Weak factorization systems and topological functors, Appl. Categ. Structures 10 (2002), 237-249.
[2] Adamek, J., Herrlich, H., and Strecker, G.E., “Abstract and Concrete Categories”, Wiley, New York, 1990.
[3] Anderson, D.D. and Batanieh, M., Generalizations of prime ideals, Comm. Algebra 36 (2008), 686-696.
[4] Anderson, F. and Fuller, K., “Rings and Categories of Modules”, Springer, 1974.
[5] Borceux, F., “Handbook of Categorical Algebra: Vol. 1, Basic Category Theory”, Cambridge, 1994.
[6] Camillo, V., Commutative rings whose principal ideals are annihilators, Port. Math. 46 (1989), 63-73.
[7] Cartan, H. and Eilenberg, S., “Homological Algebra”, Princeton University Press, 1956.
[8] Dikranjan, D. and Giuli, E., Closure operators I, Topology Appl. 27 (1987), 129-143.
[9] Dikranjan, D., Giuli, E. and Tholen, W., Closure operators II, Proceedings of the Conference in Categorical Topology (Prague, 1988), Word Scientific (1989), 297-335.
[10] Dikranjan, D. and Tholen, W., “Categorical Structure of Closure Operators”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1995.
[11] Enochs, E.E. and Jenda, O.M., “Relative Homological Algebra”, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2000.
[12] Eisenbud, D., “Commutative Algebra: with a view toward algebraic geometry”, Springer, New York, 1995.
[13] Freyd, P., “Abelian Categories: An Introduction to the Theory of Functors”, Harper & Row, New York, 1964.
[14] Fuller, K.R., Relative projectivity and injectivity classes determined by simple modules, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2(3) (1972), 423-431.
[15] Fuller, K.R. and Hill, D.A., On quasi-projective modules via relative projectivity, Arch. Math. (Basel) 21(1) (1970), 369-373.
[16] Hill, D.A., Endomorphism rings of hereditary modules, Arch. Math. (Basel) 28(1) (1977), 45-50.
[17] Hirschhorn, P., “Model Categories and Their Localizations”, American Mathematical Society, 2003.
[18] Hosseini, S.N. and Mousavi, S.Sh., A relation between closure operators on a small category and its category of presheaves, Appl. Categ. Structures 14 (2006), 99-110.
[19] Hosseini, S.N. and Mousavi, S.Sh., Quasi left factorization structures as presheaves, Appl. Categ. Structures 22 (2014), 501-514.
[20] Kieboom, R.W., Sonck, G., Van Der Linden, T., and Witbooi, P.J., Weak (co)fibrations in categories
[21] Maclane, S. and Moerdijk, I., “Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: A First Introduction to Topos Theory”, Springer, New York, 1994.
[22] Mousavi, S.Sh. and Hosseini, S.N., Quasi right factorization structures as presheaves, Appl. Categ. Structures 19 (2011), 741-756.
[23] Marks, G. and Schmidmeier, M., Extensions of simple modules and the converse of Schur’s lemma, In: “Advances in Ring Theory", Birkhäuser, (2010), 229-237.
[24] Quillen, D.G., “Homotopical Algebra”, Springer, 1967.
[25] Rotman, J.J., “An Introduction to Homological Algebra”, Springer, New York, 2009.
[26] Rangaswamy, K.M. and Vanja, N., Quasi-projectives in abelian and module categories, Pacific J. Math. 43(1) (1972), 221-238.
[27] Salbany, S., Reflective subcategories and closure operators, Proceedings of the Conference in Categorical Topology, Springer (1976), 548-565.
[28] Tuganbaev A., “Rings Close to Regular”, Springer, 2002.
[29] Yousif, M.F. and Zhou, Y., Semiregular, semiperfect and perfect rings relative to an ideal, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 32 (2002), 1651-1671.
[30] Wisbauer, R., “Foundations of Module and Ring Theory. A Handbook for Study and Research”, Algebra, Logic and Applications 3, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1991.
Categories and General Algebraic Structures with Applications
Volume 14, Issue 1
January 2021
Pages 39-80

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics